ANDREW BOLT, HIS RIGHT WING MATES IN THE MEDIA AND THEIR ROLE WITHIN ISIS

ISIS thrives on fear. It feeds on it. Without it ISIS would wither and die. So how does ISIS create the fear it needs to thrive?

They use several resources to promote fear. They film their atrocities and publish them on the social networks on the internet using mainly You-Tube and Facebook. They have progressed in creating more fear by dreaming up ever more horrific ways of slaughtering their enemies. Mostly they are carried out in public. The mainstream media then run stories about these atrocities and, while not actually showing the killings, they direct their audience to the source where they can view the atrocities ISIS commits.

The mainstream media of the right who support the anti-Islam movement of the West then use propagandists to promote the fear to the public using commentary and selected audience response. Occasionally, propagandists like Andrew Bolt even link directly to atrocity films. How are we able to live in fear of ISIS if ISIS doesn’t have propagandists like Andrew Bolt, Tim Blair, Piers Akerman, Greg Sheridan, Janet Albrechtsen and others to perpetuate that fear? And, if there is no fear, then how can governments spend so much of our hard earned money on weapons they tell us are needed to defeat ISIS and all our other ‘enemies’ – whoever they’re supposed to be – and do so with barely a beep from the masses?

Well, here’s how it works.

Firstly, one needs to understand that ISIS is not the ‘global Islamic extremist terror organisation’ that we are told they are. They are, in fact, a creation of Western elitists whose specific role is to create fear and loathing of all of Israel and the Wests ‘enemies’. They were created by the CIA, Mossad and some elements within Britain’s MI5.

ISIS consists of three major components: First, there are those that are at the very top of the Western political power system. These are the elites of Western capitalist civilisation. They are the ones that fund, supply arms, determine policy in line with their basic agenda and ensure that the people of the ‘West’ respond appropriately to that agenda. They most certainly are not Muslims and do not represent Islam in any way. In fact one may be surprised to learn that most within the group are actually Zionists and Christians including politicians, industrialists, bankers and senior elements of the military. There are some Middle Eastern members who are associated with this group and who are Muslim but their fundamental interests lay firmly with being reliable allies of Western elites and those that support the idea of ‘Western Exceptionalism’.

Within the second component there are those who, on behalf of the first component, create propaganda, recruit, train, plan and direct the actions of those that consist of the third component. Those within the second group are professionals who have been well trained and are very experienced in their art which has been perfected ever since Vietnam, then through the First Gulf War, the invasion of Afghanistan and the invasion and destruction of Iraq. They include mercenary trainers, writers, journalists and other assorted propagandists whose job is to stir up hatred against ‘Islamists’, Islam and Muslims throughout the West. Such people work for those who have a particular interest in perpetuating the war the West is waging against Islam.

Andrew Bolt, Tim Blair, et al, are classic examples of the anti-Islam propagandists who are paid by the elitists, in this case Rupert Murdoch, who have an interest in ensuring the continuation of the war. Their interests lay in the resources of the Middle East and providing weapons to both sides. Billions are spent on developing and building new weapons, many of which will never be used.

Their other interest is in ensuring that Israel realises its ambition of becoming a Greater Israel. They also want to ensure that Palestine never becomes a sovereign state and that the Gaza Strip and the West Bank are one day absorbed and annexed to Israel thus further projecting the West’s influence and hegemony into the Middle East.

The third component of ISIS comprises those that enact the program laid out for them by the first two components. They do the killing, they commit atrocities, they commit suicide bombing missions, and fight on the front lines, often acting as storm troops, at their nominated wars both in the Middle East and wherever in the world it is expedient for the terrorists to attack Western targets directly in order to perpetuate the myth of the Islamic enemy.

Within the third component are a few misguided true believers who actually believe in the righteousness of what they are doing and are the type that usually end up volunteering for suicide operations. Mostly those of the third component, however, are an assortment of disaffected youths, adventurers, psychopaths, mercenaries and thieves out for whatever they can get out of their involvement in these activities.

All ultimately serve the requirements of those who make up the first component.
Once members of sections of the third component have served their usefulness they are destroyed by the ‘West’ with their destruction serving as part of the propaganda the ‘West’ deploys in order to deceive the people of the ‘West’ that they are in mortal combat fighting ISIS.

ISIS is the Western elite’s weapon that ensures a compliant population that is willing to sacrifice its wealth to remain safe at the expense of health, education, proper housing and care for the old and the very young. Instead, we build submarines that seem to spend more time out of the water than in it and, just when we’ve started to iron out the problems with them, they magically become obsolete and we need more of them; we buy and build aircraft that are so advanced that nobody actually knows how to operate them properly, and we’re forever buying bombs that we are told are so smart that they only ever kill terrorists.

At the heart of all this are the propagandists who lie to us constantly about ‘Islamic terrorists’, who tell us how good our weapons are and why we need them to destroy our ‘enemies’. These propagandists are the interface between the elitists that have created ISIS and the Western peoples they have set out to deceive. They are, in fact, part of the ISIS problem; a sort of inverse propaganda section within ISIS itself, bought and paid for by the elites of the West.

ANDREW BOLT, MURDOCH PAID MOUTHPIECE FOR THE PRO-POLLUTIONISTS, THINKS MELBOURNES COLDEST NIGHT IN 26 YEARS IS PROOF THERE IS NO GLOBAL WARMING

In his blog today Andrew Bolt posted this piece demonstrating how desperate he and his employers are becoming in their fight to continue polluting the planet by using non-renewable energy resources that are becoming increasingly more expensive to extract and use.

Bolt continues to be the paid voice of the rapidly shrinking denialist movement founded to protect and support the fossil fuel energy industry against the rapidly expanding renewable energy industry. Slowly, however, even some fossil fuel companies are seeing that the future belongs to the renewable energy industry and are now diversifying and investing in the renewables sector of the energy industry. Alinta Gas, Western Australia’s household gas supplier, for example, will begin selling PV solar panels with battery storage systems beginning in November. AGL, one of Australia’s largest energy suppliers is also diversifying into renewable energy resources.

Carpetbagger salesmen like Bolt who write the anti-climate change propaganda for the fossil fuel companies will soon be out of a job as desperation sets in and they have nothing to write about to support their nonsense except how cold it was in Melbourne last night.

BOLT’S THINLY VEILED RACISM IS EXPOSED

In his blog today the convicted racist Andrew Bolt writes two articles that lays bare his disgusting racism. In the first titled ‘Condemning child savers as child stealers: the poison of the “Stolen Generations” myth’, Bolt tries to tell us that the Aboriginal children taken from their families were actually taken for their own good. He attempts to assert that indigenous children were some four times likely to suffer sexual abuse than other Australians. Bolt neglects to mention that most of that abuse came from non-Aboriginals and much of it after they’d been removed from their families and in the care of the so-called missions and foster homes.

In his second article, ‘No jobs in the deserts so why keep the towns?’, Bolt argues that Aboriginal communities aren't worth continued support and that Aboriginal people would be better off if they ‘assimilated’ into the nations metropolises. Bolt knows full well that, if Indigenous and Aboriginal people deserted the bush and ‘assimilated’ into the nation’s cities then they’d likely extinguish themselves within a hundred years – which, of course, is exactly what he wants to happen. For Bolt ‘assimilation’ is a euphemism for breeding out of existence.

WILL BOLT JUMP FROM CHANNEL 10 BEFORE BEING PUSHED?

In light of Gina Rinehart leaving the Channel Ten board, one has to wonder if Bolt is thinking about ‘bailing’ out before the board cans his unprofitable Bolt Report Sunday slots. If Bolt’s blog today is anything to go by it would seem that it’s crossed his mind. When a reader suggested Bolt could be "very lonely in the staff room", Bolt responded by saying: “And as a News Corp man even lonelier. Might have to bail, Frank.”

One can only hope!

BOLT’S TWIST TO SUIT THE MOMENT

Back in August 2010 Bolt argued that Islam was an ideology and not a race. Armed with this argument Bolt attempted to extricate himself from being accused of being a racist over his stance on Muslims. It’s also an argument that has long been used by his anti-Islam supporters especially those that comment on his blog.

Today, however, Bolt has done a complete U-turn and is now saying that it is indeed racist to be anti-Muslim as he calls for something to be done about “racists” that are terrorising Muslims in Australia – particularly the Australian Defence League (ADL).

As it happens, it’s been Bolt’s anti-Islam stance over the past few years that has probably done more than anything else to foster the growth of the Australian Defence League and anti-Islam sentiment generally in Australia.

BOLT HYPOCRISY: FREE SPEECH FOR THE RIGHT BUT NOT THE LEFT

Today Bolt complains in one article about students exercising their right to freedom of speech against uni fees and implies that students be denied all help for their education because they are a ‘violent mob’ (someone swore at Tony Abbott, another knocked over a police officer [makes a change; normally it’s the other way round] and a car window got broken) while in the article just before that Bolt’s going on about how important it is for people to be able  to express themselves freely.

So it’s OK, as Bolt, et al does, to promote hatred toward boatpeople who end up in concentration camps where they can be beaten to death or so neglected they die through lack of proper treatment when they fall ill, and it’s OK to promote hatred of Islam to a point where you can support going to Islamic lands to kill them and then wonder why ‘they’ hate us so. But it’s not OK to demonstrate against high education fees.

Boltologic.

BOLT: THE PRO-POLLUTIONIST CARPETBAGGER

‘Carpetbagger’ is a derogatory term which originated in the US during the Reconstruction years (1865-1877) after the American Civil War of 1861-1865. It referred to the opportunistic and mostly fraudulent Northerners who migrated to the war-torn South in order to take advantage of the Southerners caught up in the chaos that existed there after the war. The ‘carpet bag’ itself was a fashionable piece of luggage that looked like it was made from pieces of carpet that these fraudsters and conmen arrived with in the South.

Today the term ‘carpetbagger’ is used to define those that move – more metaphorically than literally these days – into areas of dispute in order to take advantage of a given situation by which they can make money both for themselves and for their backers.

The climate change debate is one such situation in which ‘carpetbaggers’ can thrive. In particular, climate change deniers, especially those among the mainstream Murdoch commentariat, who are currently making heaps by cashing in on their boss’s own interests in non-renewable resources.

The likes of Andrew Bolt, Tim Blair, Piers Akerman, Janet Albrechtsen, Greg Sheridan and many others are paid handsomely by Rupert Murdoch to demonise Green energy technology and ideology in order to halt the diminishing demand for non-renewable energy, a resource Murdoch and many of his fellow businessmen and associates have heavily invested in.

Contrary to the collective opinion of the extreme right-wing commentators and neoconservatives who Murdoch and others, including various neoconservative and right-wing think-tanks around the world financially support, renewable energy resources are making a huge dent in the bottom line of the non-renewable energy sector, particularly among the traditional energy providers.

Domestic use of solar energy in Australia generated from both photovoltaic (p.v.) roof-top panels and wind turbines has risen sharply over the last decade or so. In South Australia some 20%-25% of domestic energy consumption is derived from solar energy. Indeed, in July 2014 South Australia’s wind farms managed to provide up to 43% of the states power needs. And, as photovoltaic and battery storage technology advances, the commercial and light industrial sector is also increasingly making use of solar energy.

These advances in both technology and the expanding use of renewable energy resources has had a considerable affect on the more conventional non-renewable resources on fuel suppliers and particularly on energy generators who are experiencing a drop in demands and, therefore, profits and revenue which, in turn, has forced them to increase their charges. Increasing prices on non-renewable energy, in turn, leads to customers turning to p.v. panels and alternative power resources.

The pro-pollutionist carpetbaggers have tried every trick in the book to get people to ignore green energy. They have attempted to demonise the use of green energy by pigeonholing green energy advocates as ‘left-wing hippies’. Bolt has even tried to say that advocates of alternative energy are like the Nazis because the Nazis were a “romantic, anti-science, nature worshipping, communal and anti-capitalist movement that tied German identity to German forests.”

The pro-pollutionist carpetbagger’s biggest ploy is their denialism about global warming and climate change in which they attempt to argue that there is no need to stop using non-renewable energy because it doesn’t create global warming or climate change. They ignore, however, the vast amount of pollution that coal, oil and gas produce and which can be seen on a daily basis hanging over the world’s big industrial cities.

The non-renewable energy industry has spent billions on promoting their coal, oil and gas products while, at the same time, spending further billions on paying their carpetbagger minions in the media to demean green energy. They have even offered climate scientists inducements to become climate change deniers in order to give their arguments some semblance of credibility while others pay journalists and media commentators to demean the green energy industry using outlandish and extremist propaganda which they attempt to link with left-wing politics.

But Tony Abbott’s recent axing of the Renewable Energy Targets program will unlikely stop renewable energy from continuing to grow as people from all walks of life get to hear about the huge savings that can be made by using p.v. panels and, in the not too distant future, going off grid completely as battery technology makes it increasingly a more realistic option to non-renewable energy.