It seems Andrew Bolt’s utterly transparent pseudo-disgust of South African white supremacist Eugene Terreblanche’s racism is seen as support for the White supremacist cause among some at the neo-Nazi Stormfront blog.
In Bolt’s latest commentary about Terreblanche’s death, Bolt attempts to invoke journalistic professionalism, (as if in his own work he actually cared about journalistic professionalism), in order to defend the monster that is Terreblanche against allegations that Terreblanche may have been sexually abusing young men.
The comments at the ‘Stormfront’ blog generally support Bolt despite Bolt’s ‘apparent’, as far as at least one Stormfront member infers, support for Jews. Another ‘Stormfront’ member, however, implies that ‘Bolt has to support Jews, Israel and Zionism because he’s part of the Jewish-owned media’.
Bolt makes it quite clear in his column that the real enemy is not Terreblanche but the blacks of South Africa – which, of course, would reflect his own views about non-white non-Europeans everywhere, particularly in Australia.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Hmmm, does the article below mean that News Limited will receive some inquiries from Race Discrimination Commissioner Graeme Innes for the comments they allow in their articles and blogs? Or is Rupert Murdoch just too powerful, just too above the reach of the law?
ReplyDelete-----
Australia tackles increase in internet racism
A national summit in Sydney is examining ways of tackling the rising tide of internet racism.
Australia's Race Discrimination Commissioner Graeme Innes, along with academics and industry groups, are taking part in the forum, which was organised by the Australian Human Rights Commission and the Internet Industry Association.
Commissioner Innes says the Federal Attorney General, Robert McClelland, has asked the human rights commission to investigate the doubling of complaints.
"In my view and the view of other speaking at the forum today its the tip of the iceberg, there's a lot racism out there," he said.
Peter Coroneos, from the Internet Industry Association, says internet does not create the problem.
"It is just another vehicle by which inappropriate human behaviour can manifest,"he said.
Mr McClelland says it's all about balancing human rights with freedom of expression.
http://www.radioaustralianews.net.au/stories/201004/2884044.htm?desktop
-------
The most debased allegation in Bolts trial was made the Merkel QC suggesting that Whites are just waiting for enough of Bolt-isms to grab their torches and pitchforks and 303's and race out to commit mass murder. He suggested such by inferring that the Bolt articles were like the 'talk' which preceeded the holocaust. "Nip it in the bud" he said.. or.. could turn violent.
ReplyDeleteUmmmm HOLOCAUST ???? which rock did he crawl out from under? As Crikey said.. just about the WORST thing you can accuse someone of is 'mass murder'...and Merkel imputed and inferred that on White Aussies.
bolty keep up for what you believe because its all for good it sticks out like dogs balls. anyone who says otherwise have not got there heart in the right place. you can always hold your head up high knowing you report on stories that are not bias and if anyone say otherwise there not being honest to themselves. saying that I'm not criticising as it is very easy to get sucked into false reporting and propaganda that some media companies use. they manipulate peoples minds and use this utter fabrication to bring in stupid laws and policies as to have more control and the ones that suffer are the normal john citizen. your one bloke that sees straight through them and thats why they fear you and are so worried about you otherwise why would they care what you said or what your options are. and thats the reason why they don't want FREEDOM OF SPEECH because the only people that don't want it is because they afraid of the truth and being exposed.they expect to intimidate and use bully tactics so if no-one says anything they can continue to do wrong with no repercussions. @ READ THIS ITS OUR CURRENT SITUATION @That is, when the government fails to protect the rights of its citizens, the government loses its legitimacy and may be justly overthrown:537
ReplyDelete“Whenever the Legislators endeavour to take away, and destroy the Property of the People, or to reduce them to Slavery under Arbitrary Power, they put themselves into a state of War with the People, who are thereupon absolved from any farther Obedience, and are left to the common Refuge, which God hath provided for all Men, against Force and Violence.
Whensoever therefore the Legislative shall transgress this fundamental Rule of Society; and either by Ambition, Fear, Folly or Corruption, endeavour to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other an Absolute Power over the Lives, Liberties, and Estates of the People; By this breach of Trust they forfeit the Power, the People had put into their hands, for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to the People, who have a Right to resume their original Liberty.”536
Full and free exercise of this right [to teach the truth as he sees it] by the citizen is ordinarily also his duty; for its exercise is more important to the Nation than it is to himself. Like the course of the heavenly bodies, harmony in national life is a resultant of the struggle between contending forces. In frank expression of conflicting opinion lies the greatest promise of wisdom in governmental action; and in suppression lies ordinarily the greatest peril